Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 4.01

« May 2004 | Main | July 2004 »

June 29, 2004

How to stop dog attacks

Human communities have no reason to tolerate any dog that has, unprovoked, attacked a human being. That a dog that "mauled" a six-year-old boy yesterday, according to the stories in today's Globe and Herald, was shot and killed by Boston Police is entirely appropriate. It is also unfortunate.

CBS 4 Boston also did a story on the shooting of the dog this morning. The story, "Another pit bull attack in the Boston area," is available online in the CBS4 Video Library .

Karen Pryor explains, in her book, aptly titled Don't Shoot the Dog (New York: Bantam, 1999), that "shooting the animal" is one of eight methods of getting rid of undesirable behavior exhibited by the animal. She points out that, with this method, "you will never have that behavioral problem with that subject again" (100). And indeed, "Beaver" or "Joe" (as the dog is alternately called in the Globe and Herald articles) will never attack another human again.

But shooting the dog does nothing to change the behavior that put "Joe" in the position to "maul" a six-year-old boy in the first place: the irresponsible behavior of Joe's owner. Joe's owner failed to adequately socialize his dog: an adequately socialized dog does not maul six-year-old boys--or anyone else, for that matter--unprovoked. Joe's owner failed to adequately restrain his dog: What was Joe doing, unsupervised, where he had access to a six-year-old boy? What was Joe doing, unsupervised, in an outdoor pen from which he could escape? And last, but not least, Joe's owner failed to protect his dog. What was Joe doing, unsupervised, in a place where the boy, according to the Herald, "often threw rocks at the animal in his pen."

Responsible dog ownership means raising your dog in such a way that he behaves appropriately in the human community in which he lives. It also means protecting your dog from being abused by sociopaths. No dog should ever be left outside unsupervised.

Update (30 June 2004): Mayor Menino ill-advisedly signed the breed specific legislation yesterday, as reported in the Globe today.

June 26, 2004

Dog Skate Park

As far as I know, Somerville does not have a skatepark.

Skateboarders are invited to join forces with Somerville dog owners in the interest of creating a dog skate park. Admittedly the constituency of potential users for a dog skate park is one, and he lives, not surprisingly, in Huntington Beach, California.

I'm ashamed to admit that Tyson, the Skateboarding Bulldog, has better control of his board than I ever did. In my defense, my board was a yellow plastic "Banana Board."

Skateboarding Bulldog via Boston Pooch*

*UPDATE 22 February 2006: The Boston Pooch site is, alas, defunct.

June 24, 2004

Pomp and Circumstance

After six weeks of perfect attendance, countless homework hours and heeling (uphill, both ways), Strummer graduated yesterday from the Adult Beginners Class at Canine University in Malden.

Actually, Strummer really enjoyed going to school. Though Canine University is not a place where dogs get a lot of doggy time with one another, it is a place where a dog's relationship with her owner is strengthened. The foundation of any relationship is communication. How does a verbal species communicate with a non-verbal species? With a clicker! According to most clicker training websites and books, a clicker is a child's toy that makes a cricket noise. (I don't know about you, but when I was a child, we played with things like barbies, matchbox and matches.)

Anyway, a clicker certainly puts the fun in dog-training. First, the dog learns that whenever she hears the click, she gets a treat. Then, the human uses the clicker to "mark" a desired behavior when the dog offers it. The dog sits, the dog gets a click and a treat. When the dog does not offer a desired behavior, nothing happens. Dogs like treats better than nothing. And this is why clicker training is both fun and produces results. When the dog hears the click, it knows exactly what it is doing that wins it a treat. Communication.

Training methods that rely upon correction when the dog offers undesirable behavior tell the dog when it is offering undesirable behavior. Think about it: the desired behavior is a sit. The dog looks at you; the dog gets a tug on the leash; the dog learns that looking at you is undesirable behavior. The dog looks to the left; the dog gets a tug on the leash; the dog learns that looking to the left is undesirable behavior. The dog backs away; the dog gets a tug on the leash; the dog learns that backing away is undesirable behavior. This could go on for hours before the dog actually offers a sit. What's worse, what happens when the dog finally does sit? Nothing! With a clicker, on the other hand, from the first sit, the dog gets a piece of critical information: sitting produces treats. This is fun in two ways. Treats are good, and, from the dog's perspective, she is training you: Sitting makes you click and treat. By the last day of school, Strummer and her classmates were not only sitting, they were wagging their tails while they were sitting!

In addition to sitting, in the Adult Beginner's Class at Canine University, I learned how to teach Strummer to lie quietly (no small feat in a room full of dogs), to stay, to "leave it," to come, and to walk on a loose leash.

The commencement speech was inspirational, albeit brief: "Good dog."

Update: Breed Specific Legislation in Boston

Breed Specific Legislation (BSL) will do little to protect people and dogs from being attacked by other dogs. Nonetheless, yesterday, the Boston City Council voted 7-4 in favor of "some of the most comprehensive restrictions on pit bull ownership in the state," according to Donovan Slack's, article, "Council approves pit bull restrictions," in today's Boston Globe. "Mayor Thomas M. Menino pledged to sign the measure when it reaches his desk."

The same author reported on the question, Muzzle or nuzzle? yesterday.

If Boston pit bull owners are going to change their mayor's mind, it is in their best interest to practice and promote responsible dog ownership now. It certainly does not help the breed's cause in Boston that, yesterday, the same day that the Council voted in favor of the ordinance, a Boston police officer's pit bull, missing since the night before, attacked a Shiba Inu inflicting a broken leg and puncture wounds, according to Elisabeth J. Beardsley and Sheila Halloran's story, "Deadly attack puts pit bulls in doghouse," in the Boston Herald.

Last week, "police shot and killed a pit bull after the dog attacked an exterminator, a dog catcher and a cop and killed another dog yesterday afternoon in Roslindale" according to David Weber, writing in the Herald ("Raging pit bull killed by cops after vicious attacks on 3"). Dog-owners, please, if your dog will be home when a contractor will be doing work in your home, restrain your dog and advise the contractor that there is a dog on the premises.

It is unacceptible when a dog of any breed attacks people or other dogs. It is also illegal (see Code of Ordinances, City of Somerville, Massachusetts, Sec. 3-33. Disturbance of the peace by dogs.) Breed specific legislation will not stop dog attacks; responsible dog ownership and enforcement of existing laws will. If you are the victim or the witness of a dog-attack, please report the incident to the local authorities. I did.

June 18, 2004

Future of Nunziato Field Dog Run

Somerville dog owners interested in the future of the dog run at Nunziato Field are encouraged to contact their aldermen. To find out who your alderman is, go to My Somerville, and enter your street address.

The American Kennel Club lists several reasons why dog parks are good for communities in their brochure on Establishing a Dog Park in your Community:

Allows dogs to exercise and socialize safely. Puppies and adult dogs need room to run, and enclosed play areas permit them to do so while preventing them from endangering themselves and others (for example, by running into the path of an oncoming vehicle). In addition, dogs who are accustomed to playing with animals and people other than their owners are more likely to be well-socialized and react well toward strangers.

Promotes responsible dog ownership. Dog parks prevent off-leash animals from infringing on the rights of other community residents and park users such as joggers, small children, and those who may be fearful of dogs. Parks also make it easier for a city to enforce its leash laws, as resident dog owners with park access have no reason to allow their canine companions off-leash when outside of the park.

Provides an outlet for dog owners to socialize. Dog parks are a great place for owners to meet other people with common interests. The love people share for their dogs reaches beyond economic and social barriers and helps to foster a sense of community. Park users also benefit from the opportunity to ask questions of other owners and find solutions to problems they might be having with their pet

Make for a better community by promoting public health and safety. Well-exercised dogs are better neighbors who are less likely to create a nuisance, bark excessively and destroy property. Their presence in the park, along with their owners, also helps to deter crime.

If you own a dog, chances are you've already got a long list of reasons why fenced-in off-leash areas are good for the residents of Somerville. My top three are

1) Since I adopted a dog, I have met and gotten to know a lot of people in the places where I bring my dog to run off-leash. If there were legal off-leash areas in Somerville, I would be meeting and getting to know my neighbors. Designated off-leash areas foster community relationships.

2) I am enrolled in training classes with my dog and I practice commands with my dog in my living room. Thus my dog is very well behaved in my living room. If it were legal for me to take my dog to parks in Somerville, I could practice commands with my dog in the park: she would learn to obey commands in an environment with a lot more distractions than there are in my living room. If Somerville had designated off-leash areas, Somerville's dogs would be better trained and better behaved dogs.

3) Responsible dog owners, because they are responsible, could really benefit the City's parks if our dogs were allowed in the City's parks. Dog owners who violate the municipal ordinance prohibiting dogs in parks, are de facto irresponsible dog owners. A dog owner who is all alone, surreptitiously breaking the law by having his dog in a park where dogs are not allowed, is very likely to neglect to pick up after his dog. Responsible dog owners, on the other hand, not only pick up after our dogs, but, to protect our dogs and ourselves from contracting parasites and diseases from coming into contact with other dogs' feces, we also pick up after other dogs whose irresponsible owners have neglected to do so. We are the only people in the City who carry spare plastic bags with us for the express purpose of picking up dog poop. If Somerville allowed responsible dog owners to exercise our dogs in the City's parks, the City's parks would be cleaner.

History of Nunziato Field Dog Run

Brock Parker reported in the Somerville Journal yesterday ("Planning office gets changed") that

OHCD [Office of Housing and Community Development] director James Kostaras said Tuesday that he is planning to reorganize and rename OHCD in an effort to streamline the department and underline its emphasis on economic development. . . .

Under Kostaras' plan, OHCD would be renamed as the Office of Strategic Planning and Community Development.

Since 2001, OHCD has been investigating "the feasibility and implications of creating a dog run along the Summer Street side of Nunziato Field."

At the Regular Meeting of the Board of Aldermen on October 25, 2001 the Board adopted an order by Alderman James V. McCallum (Ward 4),

That OCHD create a dog run along the Summer Street side of Nunziato Field and post appropriate signs. [Board Order #170236 (see the 2001 Minutes of the Board of Aldermen)]

Stephen M. Post, who was executive director of OHCD at the time, responded to Board Order #170236 in a letter to the Board of Alderman dated December 12, 2001 and placed on file at City Hall. In his letter, Post wrote:

Sherri Geldersma, Director of Open Space and Parks, will investigate the feasibility and implications of creating a dog run along the Summer Street side of Nunziato Field, and she, or another member of my staff, will return our findings to the Honorable Board. [File #170467 Communication from City Officer, OHCD Director Responding to #170236 re: a dog run at Nunziato Field (The letter is a public document; City Clerk, John Long, graciously provided a copy. Receipt of Post's letter is recorded in the minutes to the Regular Meeting of the Board of Alderman on December 13, 2001.)]

At the Regular Meeting of the Board of Aldermen on February 13, 2003--just over one year and some personnel changes later-- the Board of Aldermen adopted the order by Aldermen Thomas F. Taylor (Ward 3), Bruce M. Desmond (At Large), William A. White, Jr. (At Large), Joseph A. Curtatone (At Large), Denise Provost (At Large), and Maryann M. Heuston (Ward 2),

That the Commissioner of Public Works, the Chief of Police and the Director of Housing and Community Development address the continuing issues at Nunziato Field, specifically, locking and unlocking the field at posted times, dog feces, and the lack of a dog run, and report back to this Board within 30 days. This is one of many past requests to resolve these problems. [Board Order #173275 (see the 2003 Minutes of the Board of Aldermen)]

I have spoken with Sherri Geldersma, who will be the Director of Urban Design in the new Office of Strategic Planning and Community Development. Although she will no longer be directly involved in the administration of Parks and Open Spaces, she says she will continue to serve in an advisory capacity to the task force that is being put together by the mayor to consider off-leash options in Somerville.

Somerville dog owners interested in the future of the dog run at Nunziato Field are encouraged to contact their aldermen. To find out who your alderman is, go to My Somerville, and enter your street address.

June 15, 2004

Extending the Minuteman Path

Among its plans for the extension of the Minuteman Bikeway from Cedar Street to Central Street, Somerville's Friends of the Community Path "is hoping to add a community garden or dog walk to the path."

Friends of the Community Path will present its plans June 15 at the 25% Design hearing, which is open to Somerville residents. . . . The 25% Design hearing will be held June 15 at 6:30 p.m. at the Visiting Nurses Assisted Living Community, 259 Lowell St., third floor (from a June 2 article by Jessica Barnett in the Somerville City News).

Dog owners are strongly encouraged to attend the presentation tonight to learn more and voice their support for the dog walk.

June 14, 2004

Every dog has its dae

As in sundae.

From the craigslist > boston> pets forum Friday afternoon...

Frosty Paws

In the words of one craigslist poster, Frosty Paws are "a non-dairy ice cream-like treat for pooches. Safe for them to eat, unlike REAL ice cream." Frosty Paws apparently don't taste like ice cream at all, though. No wonder: the main ingredients are water, dried whey, soy flour, and animal fat.

Strummer seemed to really enjoy her first Frosty Paw on Friday night. It took her maybe ten minutes to eat the whole thing--she licked it like an ice cream cone.

I found them at DeMoula's in the ice cream freezers. According to the Frosty Paws representative with whom I spoke, Star Market carries them as well. For additional vendors, you can call Frosty Paws (1-800-225-3636): they offer to mail you coupons when you do.

Another craigslist poster offered the following recipe for homemade frozen dog treats (here are some ideas for substitutions):

32 oz. vanilla yogurt
1 mashed banana or one large jar of baby fruit
2 T. peanut butter
2 T. honey

Blend together and freeze in either 3 oz. paper cups or ice cube trays.
Microwave just a few seconds before serving.

No chocolate syrup on your dog's sundae, though. Chocolate can cause death in dogs.

June 6, 2004

Why we love our City Clerk

Somerville City Clerk, John J. Long, is doing a good job and giving the residents of Somerville our money's worth out of the taxes that pay his salary. Camille Dodero, in her article in the issue of the Boston Phoenix for May 21 - 27, 2004, "SOMERVILLE: Defying the Man," reveals just how efficient our City Clerk is:

At four o?clock, Somerville city clerk John J. Long sat down at his desk for a final tally. On May 17, the City Clerk?s Office dispensed 10 birth certificates, issued eight dog licenses, granted eight heterosexual-marriage licenses that had been requested the previous week, fielded countless questions from reporters calling from Georgia to Japan, notarized one document, assisted in one genealogy search, processed the City Hall mail, and presided over one same-sex wedding held upstairs. And, of course, the City Clerk?s Office accepted same-sex marriage-license applications ? 37 in total, with as many as 10 from out-of-state couples. Looking down at a notepad, Long admitted that the grand total of 37 could?ve included one or two applications from heterosexual couples. But by that hour, all the paperwork had started to look the same.

Strummer's was one of those eight dog licenses.

Thank you John J. Long.

June 5, 2004

Identity Theft and Missing Dogs

Chigger, at blogdogs.com, offers sound advice to dogs regarding identity theft and protecting your identity.

Blogdogs.com offers a dog's-eye view on the internet. Though infrequently updated, it is funny. Fall-off-the-couch roll-on-the-floor funny.

Seriously, though. Permanent positive identification can mean the difference between finding your dog and never finding your dog again if he ever gets lost.

Collar tags are good: Somerville dog owners are subject to state laws requiring that dogs wear tags indicating that they are licensed by the City and that their rabies vaccinations are current (see Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 140: Section 137 Registration and licenses and Chapter 140: Section 145B Vaccination against rabies; certificate; tag; proof of vaccination; penalty). But tags and collars can, themselves, be lost (and stolen). If your dog is lost and is not wearing his collar and tags, chances are you will never see your dog again.

Dog owners have two options for permanently identifying their dogs: tattoos and microchips.1 The American Kennel Club Companion Animal Recovery (AKC-CAR) program "provides 24-hour recovery services for microchipped and tattooed pets. The enrollment database is located in Raleigh, NC, but maintains records from around the world."

A tattoo is etched on the inside of the dogs thigh near his abdomen. The area is shaved to make application easier and less irritating to the skin, but it grows back and can obscure the number.2

Tattoos can be altered or removed by a determined dog thief, but the real problem with the tattoo is its permanence. What do you tattoo on your dog? Your phone number? What if you move?
There is no consistency in the identifying marks , which can include anything from a coded series of digits and letters officially assigned by a national tattoo registry, to a graphic symbol, to a phone number. . . . [P]eople move, or give their pets away, and a tattoo with a no longer valid phone number or address will probably not be helpful.3
AKC-CAR recommends that pet owners choose a unique, alphanumeric tattoo number.

The benefit of a microchip is that it is "encoded with a unique and unalterable identification number".4 You can change or add additional contact information by contacting the registry in which you enrolled your dog. In the early days of the microchip technology, a valid concern was that chips manufactured by different companies were not readable, and in some cases not recognizable, by all scanners. In 1996, however, a universal scanner was developed. Universal scanners have since been widely distributed to animal shelters.5

I have chosen to have my dog microchipped. Strummer was microchipped last month.

1A website called Dognose ID claims that the nose print of a dog is, like a human thumbprint, a unique identifier. If nose printing were an effective method of permanent positive identification, it would certainly have the benefit of being non-invasive. However, the company claims that "the Canadian Thoroughbred Kennel Club, the equivalent of the American Kennel Club, or AKC, in the U.S., has accepted nose prints as proof of identity of dogs since 1938." The Canadian equivalent of the AKC is, in fact, the Canadian Kennel Club/Club Canin Canadien. The Canadian Kennel Club sponsors CANADACHIP, a national pet rescue program.

2 Norma Bennett Woolf, "Microchips: Grain-sized microchip can be Fido's ticket home," Dog Owner's Guide.

3Ardeth Baxter, "Tracking your dog or cat: identification methods," PageWise, Inc.

4 Microchipping, AKC-CAR.

5 Banfield veterinary clinics, which operate out of Petsmart stores, introduced a new microchip in February 2004. Unlike the microchips of the leading manufacturers, Digital Angel Corporation, formerly Destron Fearing, (manufacturer of HomeAgain) and Avid Identification Systems Inc., which use a 125kHz frequency, Banfield uses a 134.2 kHz chip, the international standard. According to Sandra Eckstein, writing in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution,

Banfield stopped shipping out microchips this month and won't resume shipping until mid-July. During that time, it will distribute about 700 additional scanners. The chip manufacturer also will distribute 900 scanners, according to Alex Schrage, vice president of business development for Banfield. Those scanners . . . will detect both frequencies of microchips ("Banfield veterinary clinics to temporarily stop shipping microchips" ).

June 2, 2004

Breed or Species

Researchers at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Institute in Seattle, Washington, have been involved in two recent studies of dog genetics. In March, the results of a study by Deborah Lynch of the Canine Studies Institute in Aurora, Ohio, and Jenny Madeoy, of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Institute were widely reported. Lynch and Madeoy concluded that all contemporary dog breeds descend from "ten progenitor breeds" and propose groupings of contemporary breeds according to these ancestries, which differ from the American Kennel Club's seven groups.

In May the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center again made headlines. The center's Elaine Ostrander and colleagues confirmed that selective breeding has resulted in distinct genetic differences between breeds. Pedigree dogs, it turns out, may facilitate research into inherited diseases, because, unlike the human population, the inbreeding in pedigree dogs produces many subjects with "the same genetic disposition" to a given disease.

This boon to researchers, of course, is the bane of pure-bred dog owners. Take, for example, the Standard Poodle. The website, Versatility in Poodles lists a daunting number of congenital disorders in the Standard Poodle gene pool, including hip dysplasia, sebaceous adenitis, progressive retinal atrophy, cataracts, Von Willebrand?s disease, thyroid malfunction, Addison?s Disease, auto immune hemolytic anemia, Juvenile Renal Disease, epilepsy, inflammatory bowel disease, and gastric torsion/bloat. (John Armstrong writes, in "The Nature of Genetic Disease" (2000 rev.), available online at The Canine Diversity Project, that some "genetic diseases" are, in fact, conformational problems: "If the fancy as a whole decides that a taller, narrower dog looks more "refined," more of that description will be kept for breeding purposes, and the population will be shifted toward a more bloat-prone conformation.")

Through selective breeding of dogs, the modern breeds have been developed. Historically, selective breeding was practiced to achieve functional results: dogs who could hunt badgers, chasing them into and retrieving them from their underground holes, i.e. the Dachshund; dogs who could withstand the arctic climate and pull heavy loads, i.e. the Siberian Husky and the Alaskan Malamute; dogs who could kill foxes, i.e. the Fox Terrier. Today, as evidenced by the AKC's breed standards, selective breeding is concerned almost entirely with morphology, which is to say appearance. A sad example of this is the sloping hind-quarters of the German Shepherd Dog, which makes the breed highly susceptible to arthritis. Other sad examples include the stunted snout of the Pug, which causes respiratory problems, and the oversized skull of the English Bulldog, which exceeds the capacity of the birth canal, requiring surgery in order for puppies to be delivered. (See, for example, The Millennium Bulldog Club of Pretoria (South Africa), General guidelines for breeding Bulldogs, "Caesarian or not," and Celeste A. Clements' article "Breed Spotlight on Pugs: Not Just Another Pretty Face".)

In The New Work of Dogs: Tending to Life, Love, and Family (New York: Randon House [Villard], 2003), Jon Katz argues that most dogs in America today have the task of "attending to the emotional lives" of their owners. Yet, the ability to do this work is not something that is being selected for by dog breeders. In general, no one is selectively breeding for the qualities that make a good pet.

If you are looking for a good dog for a pet, you are just as likely to get one from an animal shelter or rescue organization as from a breeder. The Dog Owner's Guide offers several considerations of the pros and cons of owning a mixed breed dog. Rescue organizations differ from animal shelters in that the former do not have kennels, in which an assortment of dogs from which you may choose are housed. Rescued dogs are housed individually with foster families who socialize and train the dogs before the dogs are deemed "adoptable." Most likely, a dog adopted from a good rescue organization will be house-trained and will have the foundation of the basic obedience commands. Additionally, the foster family should have introduced the dog to a lot of different people and other household pets; therefore, the dog should have a rudimentary understanding of how to behave among humans in our homes and in our world.

All Breed Shelters

The Animal Rescue League of Boston has four adoption centers--in Boston, Dedham, East Brewster and Pembroke--and offers dog training classes (for owned animals and those adopted from ARL) at all of their animal centers.

At Buddy Dog Humane Society, in Sudbury, "adoption counselors work with potential adopters to match them with a friend for life."

Boston's captured strays, as well as pets that are unclaimed by their owners, are available for adoption at the City of Boston Animal Shelter, run by Boston Animal Control, in Roslindale.

The Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (MSPCA) has seven animal care and adoption centers in Boston, Methuen, Cape Cod, Nantucket, Martha's Vineyard, Brockton and Springfield.

All Breed Rescue Organizations

Boston Dog Rescue in West Roxbury rescues dogs from local pounds and shelters, as well as shelters in the south. All dogs available for adoption reside in foster homes.

Save A Dog rescues adoptable dogs from southern shelters. Their dogs reside in foster homes, but Save A Dog holds occasional adoption events at local pet service providers (kennels, pet supply stores), where you can "Meet and Greet" dogs that are available for adoption.