Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 4.01

« October 2004 | Main | December 2004 »

November 30, 2004

'Tis the season

L.L. Bean's Wicked Good Fleece ThrowIf you are thinking about giving a dog as a gift this holiday season, please consider that you are not only giving a person a dog, you are also giving a dog a person. Imagine a puppy with a bow around its neck on Christmas morning. Now Imagine this: It's President's Day--where is the puppy? Where is the person who got the puppy as a gift? How about on the fourth of July? Where is the dog next Christmas?

I have no doubt that many beautiful human-canine relationships began with the dog wearing a ribbon around its neck. But the fate of many dogs who were wearing a bow when they entered the family is that of Ernie, "a fluffy, 10-week-old golden retriever with heart-melting eyes, [who] was originally a birthday present:"

Illustration by Nina FrenkelAs he went through the normal stages of retriever development--teething, mouthing, racing frantically around the house, peeing when excited, offering items the family didn't want retrieved, eating strange objects and then vomiting them up--the casualties mounted. Rugs got stained, shoes chewed, mail devoured, table legs gnawed. The family rejected the use of a crate or kennel--a valuable calming tool for young and energetic dogs--as cruel. Instead, they let the puppy get into all sorts of trouble, then scolded and resented him for it. He was "hyper," they complained, "wild," "rambunctious." The notion of him as annoying and difficult became fixed in their minds; perhaps in his as well.

A practiced trainer would have seen, instead, a golden retriever that was confused, under-exercised, and untrained--an ironic fate for a dog bred for centuries to be calm and responsive to humans.

Ernie did not attach to anybody in particular--an essential element in training a dog. Because he never quite understood the rules, he became increasingly anxious. He was reprimanded constantly for jumping on residents and visitors, for pulling and jerking on the leash when walked. Increasingly, he was isolated when company came or the family was gathered. . . . His walks grew brief: outside, down the block until he did his business, then home. He never got to run much.

Complaining that he was out of control, the family tried fencing the back yard and putting Ernie outside during meals to keep him from bothering them. The nanny stuck him there most of the day as well, because he messed up the house. Allowed inside at night, he was largely confined to the kitchen, sealed off by child gates.1

1 Jon Katz, ''Poor Little Rich Dog,'' I've linked to Ernie's story before: "Not by bread (or kibble) alone."

It's President's Day--Massachusetts school children are on vacation. Can the recipient of your holiday gift spend President's day with a puppy? Can they afford to hire a dog sitter or board the puppy? Does the puppy have his shots? Most kennels require that dogs be vaccinated for rabies, distemper and bordetella (kennel cough).

It's the Fourth of July. Is the dog at the family picnic? Has the recipient of your holiday gift trained the dog not to steal the burgers?

It's Christmastime next year. Does the grandmother of the recipient of your gift come to the family's holiday dinner? Or is she in the hospital from a broken hip from when the dog tackled her on Thanksgiving?

Many breeders and shelters will not place an animal with a client who indicates that s/he is interested in the animal as a gift. Breeders and shelters alike want to know that the person who will be responsible for the animal is ready for the responsability.

  • Can the person afford the cost of the animal's food, training, grooming, boarding, veterinary health care, etc.?
  • Does the person have time for a dog?
  • Can the person provide adequate stimulation and exercise for the animal?
  • Is the person prepared for the realities an animal shedding/soiling/cheweing in her or his home?
  • Can the person commit to these and other responsabilities for the natural life of the animal?
  • Does the person know the average life-expectancy/health risks/energy level/etc. of the breed?

Reasons that people who love the animals in their care give for not selling or adopting their animals include the admonition that "A Dog Isn't Just for Christmas, It's for Life" and the simple observation that "Christmas is not a good time to introduce a new animal into a household."

For those who will not be disuaded, there is a lot of decent advice available to help you ensure your gift's destiny as a beloved new addition to the family rather than another chore, or, worse, a menace and danger.

On PageWise: We've got answers Carol Tilley-Williams writes,

Make a list of responsibilities and necessary expenses associated with acquiring a pet. One of the most important considerations should be veterinary expense. Aside from shots and worming, many dogs and cats can have congenital illnesses or allergies that are not evident at the time you acquired him/her. Such can require very expensive treatments, sometimes for the life of the pet. Making sure any animal you are considering has been thoroughly examined and given a clean bill of health by a veterinarian beforehand is essential. Any reputable breeder or shelter will be glad to provide this information for you. If you're planning to get a cat and want it de-clawed, be aware of this expense. Also, everyone should include spaying and neutering into this category.

Make sure in your mind as well as your heart that your child is ready for the long term obligation to a pet. A very young child most often does not and cannot truly understand beyond short term gratification. Are you prepared to pick up the slack when and if Sally suddenly losses interest in Spot? Take your child for several visits to a friend or relative who owns a pet. Allow him or her to spend time with the pet and to perform some of the necessary functions of a pet owner, such as feeding and watering, letting the animal outside when needed or walking on a leash, and brushing the pet. As a precaution, keep the pet owner nearby so the pet will feel at ease and your child can get instruction for the tasks. If the child is quickly bored, chances are pretty good that he/she would tire of the daily demands of a pet.

Catherine, a concerned contributor at DogReader cautions, "under no circumstances whatsoever, [do you] want to take a puppy home that is younger than eight weeks."

The Humane Society of the United States suggests,

Instead of buying a puppy or kitten as a gift, consider waiting to adopt a pet after the holidays. You could even build some excitement for a post-holiday adoption. You could give a loved one a "gift certificate" from a local shelter. . . . You could also wrap up some useful pet supplies?a dog bowl, a cat collar, a scratching post, or an exercise wheel for a hamster or gerbil. . . .

Francoise Ellem makes the excellent point that

If you wait until the weeks AFTER Christmas to bring home a dog, you will often find a wide choice of pups of many breeds and mixes available at shelters and rescues nationwide. It's often the shelters' busiest time of year! These are the dogs that weren't given with enough thought as gifts and are already being given up. It's a big problem that can work FOR you as a potential, thoughtful, dog owner. They come at a substantially lower price . . . . They are often are already spayed and neutered, and in older dogs, many may already be housetrained and trained for general manners. Some of those pups may be the very same ones you may have seen in the petstores not a week, or a month, earlier! Not only will you save money for the same dog, you may save a life. . . .

Finally, some very practical advice from from Anthony Olszewski (PETCRAFT):

A very young puppy might require up to five meals a day. You can't just leave out a dish of food. Puppies should quickly get into the habit of having regular meals. Remember, what goes in one end will come out the other! [My emphasis.] If the pup eats on and off, whenever the mood strikes him or her, the pup will also defecate with no discipline. Someone must be home during the day to make sure that the little guy eats and is taken out on a schedule. The most important time to get the dog out is first thing in the morning. This means that you must jump out of bed, quickly get dressed, and take the puppy out. If you stop to put on the coffee, you will probably be too late. Dogs are creatures of habit - you decide if you want to start the puppy on the right track or not.

By contrast, Olszewski points out that "a young dog, six to eight months old, only needs to be fed twice a day." A young dog, therefore, might be easier for a new/busy owner to accomadate.

A good rule of thumb for how many hours [a] puppy can can hold his bladder and bowels is his age in months plus one [or a maximum of nine hours]. So a three-month old puppy can hold it for four hours, a five-month-old puppy for six hours, and so on. From seven months through adulthood, he should be able to hold it for nine hours total during the day, if necessary . . . .2

2Sue Sternberg, Successful Dog Adoption (p. 157).

November 24, 2004

Dogs and Diversity

Ahmed Tharwat, producer and host of the Arab/Muslim-American television show Belahdan in Minnesota's Twin Cities, describes his first social experience as a dog owner:

I noticed something new was happening out there, something Arab-Americans have rarely experienced since Sept. 11. People on the street, in their cars, in the parking lot, and at the supermarket were giving me a new look?a friendly one. Strangers who used to skillfully avoid eye contact now wanted to engage me in warm conversation. . . . . Families congregated around me with their children to see the cute puppy. . . .

Tharwat cautions dog-owners, however, not to use their dogs to reach out across the cultural divide to their Muslim neighbors:

In Islamic tradition, Muslims are prohibited from touching the saliva of dogs. If you do come in contact with a dog, you're supposed to wash your hands seven times before you pray. Most Muslims will avoid dogs at all cost to stay clean for their daily prayers.

Dog-owners are reminded that sit-to-greet is the preferred behavior of a dog that is being introduced to a friendly stranger.

November 22, 2004

The Dog Walkers Diet

When Sue Lundstrom hit middle age, she knew she was going to have to work harder to keep the pounds from creeping up on her.

So she grabbed a leash and took her dogs for a walk. ``Once I turned 40, I realized I needed to do a lot of walking to keep off weight,'' said Lundstrom, 45, who walks a 3-mile path in North Reading with her dogs, Bert and Thomas, five times a week.

Via the Boston Herald.

Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc., the makers of Science Diet® and Prescription Diet®1 sponsored the People and Pets Exercising Together (P-PET) study, a study of "the effectiveness of treatment of both overweight people and overweight pet dogs in a combined targeted program compared to focusing on people alone and pet dogs alone," and has tips for exercising together.

1Strummer eats Eukanuba® Natural Lamb & RiceTM.

November 19, 2004

City Safety

A friend who moved to the South End from the suburbs has found her comfort zone. "When I walk home at night, I go by the dog park, because it makes me feel safer," she says.

Dog parks do make communities safer.

Via Boston Globe Magazine.

Only one day to som|dog's Conway Park Clean-Up!

November 17, 2004

Boston: Dog Recreation Spaces Ordinance

Only three days to som|dog's Conway Park Clean-Up!

On the Boston City Calendar tomorrow is an item of interest to dog lovers:

Title: Hearing

Boston City Council
Docket #1371
Ordinance re: establishing procedures for the Creation,
Maintenance, and use of Dog Recreation Spaces [pdf].

Location: Boston City Hall
Christopher Iannella Chamber
5th Floor
Boston, MA 02201

Time: 1:00 PM

Nearest T Station:Government Center

This is a public hearing: If you are interested in dog recreation in Boston, please attend this important meeting!

For more information contact Councillor Michael Ross, or Alicia Rampulla, City Council Government Operations Liaison, (617) 635-4645/1185.

Via personal e-mail. See also The South End.

Addional information (from Boston Dogs):

Date: Tue Oct 26, 2004 2:03 pm
Subject: [Bostondogs] "Dog Recreation Space" Ordinance

. . .

The following is a message I sent to the South End forum (South End Neighborhood BB) to let folks know the actual thrust of the proposed ordinance. I thought it might be helpful to share it with this group:


Many folks have received a message today . . . from Randi Lathrop [Deputy Director of Community Planning for the Boston Redevelopment Authority] announcing that City Councillor Mike Ross will be holding a public hearing on "making dog parks legal" on November 18, 1-4 PM at City Council chambers. That message has generated lots of questions. I thought I would provide . . . a bit of background so that Southenders are reasonably well informed on the issue.

Over a year ago, Councillor Mike Ross (District 8, Back Bay, Beacon Hill, Fenway) created a Task Force specifically to look at dog recreation space needs and to help craft legislation that would address long-standing complaints by both dog owners and non-dog owners alike. The Task Force included representatives, myself included, from many of Boston's neighborhoods (Back Bay, Roslindale, North End, South End) including non-dog owners such as folks from the Boston Runner's Club, North End Baseball, as well as many dog owners from throughout the City, and reps from Animal Control, Parks and Recreation, MSPCA, and others. The Task Force went about the work of trying to identify basic dog recreation space needs and possible balanced and sensible solutions. I think it is safe to say that the draft legislation1 introduced by Councillor Ross [at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Boston in the Christopher A. Iannella Chamber, City Hall] on October 6 represents the sentiments and recommendations of virtually all of the Task Force participants, dog owners and non-dog owners alike.

In addition, other Boston City Councillors were invited to participate in the Task Force work as well, and some occasionally did personally participate or ask their staff to attend meetings. An important historical note to help frame the issue: this legislation represents the first time in the history of the city that an ordinance has been offered to actually deal with and propose solutions for the dog recreation needs of Boston's residents. Honest. First time. It is a somewhat sad footnote to realize that our fair city today literally remains the only major metropolitan city in all of the US (and Canada) to have absolutely no legally sanctioned spaces or strategy to deal with the recreation needs of city dog owners.

Every other major city in the nation long ago recognized the need and created solutions. Thanks to Mike Ross, Boston may finally be able to join them.

The exact title of the legislation introduced by Councillor Ross is "An Ordinance Regarding Establishing Procedures for the Creation, Maintenance, and Use of Dog Recreation Spaces." The title importantly and accurately reflects both the actual content of the legislation as well as the overall approach to the issue that the Task Force ultimately embraced.

Simply put, the ordinance takes into consideration the unique character of every Boston neighborhood, the specific availability and limitations thereof of park and other space in any given neighborhood, the need to define dog recreation spaces specifically suitable for a given geography and user population, and the need for strong and on-going community and neighborhood support and maintenance for any approved designated dog recreation space. The legislation sensibly rejects a "cookie cutter" approach to "dog parks." Particularly in Boston, one size or approach does not fit all. Space availability, for example, in neighborhoods like Roslindale or West Roxbury, is dramatically different from that of the North End, Beacon Hill, or the South End. The number and actual acreage of Boston's parklands differs tremendously from neighborhood to neighborhood.

And the level of community based support for on-going maintenance will differ from neighborhood to neighborhood.

In sum, the legislation creates a procedure for neighborhood groups (applicants) to generate proposals (including very specific requirements) for the creation and on-going maintenance of "Dog Recreation Spaces." The proposals are then submitted to the Parks Commissioner for final approval. Proposals may include anything from defined spaces exclusively dedicated to dog recreation to varying proposals for a specific designated space to be used for dog recreation at certain times, on certain days, or at certain times of the year. While some neighborhoods may be able to create and support a full-time "dog park," such as the "unofficial" Peter's Park dog space [on Washington Street at Perry Street], others may have to craft
a dog recreation space proposal that is part-time based on space limitations and competing park user needs, such as the current "unofficial"[sic] early morning dog recreation program in place in one section of the Boston Common2.

By the way, the ordinance also has clear provisions to allow the Parks Commissioner to close down permanently any approved "dog recreation space" that is not maintained properly or that becomes either a nuisance or detriment to the neighborhood.

Because current Boston ordinances do not allow for the creation of any sanctioned dog recreation spaces, this ordinance will permit any "unofficial" space to apply for sanctioned status and will also permit neighborhoods to propose new dedicated spaces or alternatively, time/space programs where and as appropriate.

That's essentially the heart of the proposed ordinance. I'm sure that Councillor Ross and other supportive councillors will appreciate the support of both dog owners and non-dog owners alike. I encourage my fellow Southenders to support this sensible, important, and long overdue initiative. It established a process that will allow reasonable and well-managed dog recreation space proposals to become a legal reality.

Steve Fox

1Councilors Ross, Hennigan, Turner, McDermott, Murphy, Tobin, Consalvo and Flaherty offered the following:Ordinance Regarding Establishing Procedures for the Creation, Maintenance, and use of Dog Recreation Spaces.Referred to the Committee on Government Operations[Docket number 1371].

2 An official pilot program extends off-leash privileges in Boston Common from 5:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m.

UPDATE 18 November 2004, 8:20 AM: Added additional information with permission from the original author.

November 13, 2004

Citizen Strummer

This morning, as the first snowfall of the season was dispersing, Strummer earned her Canine Good Citizen Certificate at Canine University in Malden.1

To earn her CGC Certification, Strummer had to successfully perform ten tasks, testing her behavior when being greeted by friendly strangers, around other dogs, and when being handled by a canine care professional (i.e. a groomer or a veterinarian); her reliability with the basic obedience commands, "sit," "down," "stay" and "come;" and her ability to maintain her poise (i.e. not bark continually) for three minutes while her owner was not in the room. She also had to show up for the test with a responsible owner, who was required to sign a pledge to take care of her health needs, safety, exercise, training and quality of life and to show responsibility by cleaning up after her in public places and never letting her infringe on the rights of others.

Strummer is looking forward to enjoying the rights of citizenship! In an article on "Dogs and apartments," the Dog Owners Guide suggests that Canine Good Citizen Certification can assuage a potential landlord's concerns about renting an apartment to the dog's owner (see also "Locating Pet-Friendly Apartments") and "Tips for Renters with Pets". It would be great if, as a Canine Good Citizen, Strummer were allowed to accompany her responsible owner in Somerville's parks. And it would be great if there were safe and legal areas in Somerville where Canine Good Citizens could enjoy off-leash recreation under the supervision of their responsible owners.

1You'd think Malden, the home of Canine University, would be a great place to be a dog, but Malden is considering breed-specific legislation, that would require owners of "pit bulls, rottweilers, chows, Doberman pinchers, shar peis and [wolf] mixed breeds, or any other dog whose behavior endangers a person's welfare . . . to apply for a special permit costing $100 and keep the animal leashed and muzzled whenever it leaves their property" (via Canine University News, November 2004). Of course it makes sense to hold owners of dogs "whose behavior endangers a person's welfare" accountable; it is the part of the legislation that targets dogs on the the basis of breed rather than behavior that is flawed. Did you know that the American Kennel Club does not recognize the pit bull as a breed? The AKC does recognize the American Staffordshire Terrier, as well as the Bull Terrier and the Staffordshire Bull Terrier. The United Kennel Club, on the other hand, recognizes the American Pit Bull Terrier, as well as the Bull Terrier and the Staffordshire Bull Terrier, but the UKC does not recognize the American Staffordshire Terrier.

Rosebud

LadyAndStrummer.JPGLadyAndQuicky.JPG
SophieFoundIt.JPGStrummerAndLady2.JPG

November 6, 2004

Dachshund found on Lee Street

Update 08 November 2004: The Craigslist posting about the found Dachshund has been deleted. I hope that means the little guy has found his way home!