Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 4.01

« December 2004 | Main | February 2005 »

January 26, 2005

What is that blue stuff, anyway?

Have you been noticing bright blue stuff on the edges of cleared sidewalks and thinking, like me, "that can't be good."

There are several blue-colored ice melt products available, including Blue Heat Deicer, which, according to the manufacturer, Provincial Paper & Packaging Ltd., "will not harm vegetation and is safer [than conventional road salt or rock salt] for people and pets when properly applied," and Sodium Chloride based Winter Storm® Blue, "available only to the Janitorial/Sanitation" trades, from North American Salt Company, which, they say, "won?t irritate or burn the skin," and which "contains Potassium Chloride, which is not only an effective ice melting ingredient, but is also a natural fertilizer for grass, trees and other vegetation."

According to Gaia Enterprises Inc., the manufacturer of the green-colored Safe Paw?,

safepaw.jpgrock salt and other salt-based ice melters contain sodium chloride or potassium chloride which can heat up to 175 degrees when exposed to water, ice and low temperatures. . . . Exposure [to] or digesting these salt compounds can cause health problems for pets and children. . . .

For dogs, in particular, exposure to salt and salt-based ice melt products can mean an unhealthy winter and unplanned trips to the vet's office or animal hospital. The problem is that when dogs are let out they frolic and eat the snow and many of the ice melt products sit on the surface of the ice. Dogs either ingest these ice melt pellets or they get frozen into their paws. Later when they are inside with higher temperatures the ice melts and dogs begin to lick their paws.

In addition to preventing your pet from ingesting rock salt and other dangerous chemicals, special attention should be given to your pet's paws:

Among their guidelines for keeping pets safe and healthy in the winter, the Humane Society of the United States advises that pet owners "wipe the feet with a damp towel before your pet licks them and irritates his/her mouth."

Sandy Moyer, Dogs Editor at BellaOnline, The Voice of Women! recommends that dog owners "inspect paws after walking in areas treated with salt and other de-icers. Check between toes and examine the foot pads for cracks in the skin. Look closely at any inflamed areas for splinters, embedded gravel, etc."

January 23, 2005

Negative Punishment: Rehabilitation for Bullies

FightCover.jpgI got my copy of Jean Donaldson's new book, Fight: A Practical Guide to the Treatment of Dog-Dog Aggression, last week. Donaldson's discussion of the bite threshold in dogs, in her 1996 book, Culture Clash, is the most useful thing I have read for preventing dog bites. In Fight, Donaldson applies her behaviorist perspective to problems of dog-dog aggression: not only fighting, but also undesirable behaviors that are precursors to a full-blown fight, including fear and avoidance of other dogs, and pro-active lunging, barking, snapping and snarling. Donaldson's new book could be better organized, though the detailed table of contents is a great improvement over Culture Clash. And once again Donaldson could benefit from a good editor: whereas, in Culture Clash, her style was abrasive, here it is encumbered--and not just by the typos.

Anyone who has seen Strummer harass Mosley, a wonderful Golden Retriever at AAAS, will recognize Strummer in Donaldson's description of a "bully:"

Bullies . . . target certain dogs for harassment or attack. They rarely play normally with with these dogs yet play fine with others (80).
Indeed, Strummer's only "target" seems to be the lovable "Mo," who, at the park, wants nothing other than to play fetch with his person. Strummer likes to chase dogs who are chasing balls (frisbees, sticks...), and ordinarily the retriever and my meta-retriever work it out, and both enjoy themselves (though they seem to be playing two different games). But when Strummer chases this particular Retriever, their interaction is completely different. She engages in all the contact behaviors she typically employs to solicit play (i.e. she doesn't play-bow, but she nips at Mosley's legs, neck and flanks and hits him with her signature "left jab"), while he ignores her and tries to focus on his tennis ball.

I, of course, don't enjoy watching Strummer be a bully: I distract her by calling her sharply and telling her to "play nice." When she persists in bullying poor Mosley, I put her on her leash and, if she fails to settle down and pulls on the leash, we leave the park. This is almost the regimen that Donaldson recommends for treating bullying behavior.

There is a disclaimer at the beginning of the book that advises,

the services of a competent professional trainer or applied behaviorist should be sought regarding the [book's] applicability with respect to your own dog.
Fortunately, Strummer's bullying of Mosley is not dangerous to the dogs or to the human handlers, so I am comfortable trying to implement Donaldson's treatment. Moreover, Strummer's "acquired bite inhibition" is excellent. Donaldson explains that
the most important prognostic factor in dog-dog aggression is the degree of acquired bite inhibition, which determines how much damage is done when the dog bites. This can range from bites that break bones, deeply puncture muscle and create massive tearing, to bites that leave saliva but no damage whatsoever (21).
Standard Poodles were bred for a soft mouth so that, as hunting companions, they can retrieve a felled duck without damaging the bird's flesh. Strummer's mouth is so soft that, when offered a treat, she will not close her mouth to hold it until you let go of it.

Donaldson recommends treating bullying with "negative punishment," the removal of a reinforcing stimulus.

Dogs that bully other dogs find both play and harassment/fighting to be reinforcing events, so timing them out for harassment and fighting is extremely effective at reducing these (82).

The method of applying negative punishment that Donaldson recommends to teach a dog to stop bullying looks like this:

    1. Issue a Warning Cue
      A. dog continues bullying
        2a. Issue a Time-Out Cue
        3a. Execute the Time-Out
      B. dog stops bullying
        2b. Acknowledge with a "Thank you"
        3b. Continue monitoring the interaction

The command that the dog has to learn is the warning cue (Donaldson suggests "Enough," but "Play Nice!" should work just as well). The dog can either offer the desired behavior and stop harassing her target, or the dog can offer undesirable behavior and continue harassing her target. Once the dog is given the Time-Out cue (Donaldson suggests, "Too bad," or "You're out"), the dog has failed to offer the desired behavior and a Time-Out must be executed immediately.

The way this treatment works is that, if the Time-Out is executed properly, the dog learns the warning command, i.e. the dog is eventually able to reliably offer the desired behavior when the warning command is issued (scenario B). I'm not sure what purpose saying "Thank You" serves. Perhaps it merely addresses the human's need to respond to the dog's reaction, turning negative punishment into an opportunity for positive reinforcement.

In fact, teaching a dog not to bully by negative punishment is like teaching a dog the "Sit" command by positive reinforcement. The method of teaching a dog the "Sit" command by positive reinforcement (e.g. clicker training) looks like this:

    1. Issue the command cue, "Sit"
      A. dog does not sit
        2a. nothing happens
      B. dog sits
        2b. Click and
        3b. Treat

In both cases (negative punishment and positive reinforcement), scenario B is what the dog is supposed to learn. Whereas by negative punishment, the dog learns to prevent something bad from happening (the punishment, administered as a Time-Out), in positive reinforcement, the dog learns to make something good happen (the reinforcement, administered as a treat.) The difference is that in teaching a dog the "Sit" command, you can shape the desired behavior before teaching the cue, so that the dog already knows how to sit when you start teaching her the command. In teaching a dog not to bully, you can't really shape the desired behavior with the target before teaching the warning cue.

UPDATE January 25, 2005: There is two feet of snow on the ground, and who did Strummer meet at Triple-A-S this afternoon? Mosley! ...whose tennis ball was aparently lost within twenty seconds of his arrival at the park. After Moe showed the little Strummer girl how to bound through the snow, they had a great time chasing each other! Ah, snow. It brings out the best in all of us...

January 19, 2005

Whoa. When did that happen?

Check out the new City of Somerville website!

The old site had its quirks, but it really did include a lot of helpful information and was more or less easy to navigate (once you figured out its quirks).

I haven't had a chance to spend much time on the new site, but here are two observations...

"My Somerville," where you can look up City information ("Real Estate Assessments, Trash pickup & recycling schedule, Yard waste pickup schedule, Where to Vote, My Government Representatives") by residential address, is now accessible from the main page.

I used to go to "Information for Residents" to look up Municipal Ordinances. Now Municipal Ordinances are listed under "City Clerk," under "Departments" on the main page.

January 16, 2005

How to de-skunk a dog

lavecanem.jpg

I received an e-mail from East Somerville last week about one Somerville dog's experience with the business end of a skunk.

So when I took Strummer to Laundromutt in Cambridge, yesterday, I didn't have to think twice about registering for their Skunk Hotline. Registration is free! Then, if your dog gets skunked when Laundromutt is not open, you can call them and they'll open the store for you so you can bathe your dog in one of their state-of-the-art tubs. A private after-hours de-skunking visit is $50.00. (If your dog gets skunked when Laundromutt is open, you don't have to be registered to purchase their Skunk Service for $25.00.)

Yesterday was our first visit to Laundromutt, "a self-service dog wash and dog lounge," on Concord Avenue. I purchased "a-la-carte" services for Strummer: shampoo, conditioner and blowdry for $21.00. While I was blow-drying and brushing Strummer, two other dogs got baths. Yah, a non-shedding dog like a Standard Poodle is high maintenance, but it's a small price to pay if you hate vacuuming as much as I do. And with Laundromutt, the price is even smaller!

Laundromutt has several bathing and grooming stations. They also have a dog lounge with leather sofas, copies of Bark Magazine and The Pet Gazette, and Cable TV--a good venue for an AKC/Eukanuba National Championship Party! Maybe next year...

Update January 17, 2004: I was talking with Luna's person, yesterday, and she told me about the following solution to neutralize skunk spray:

1 quart of 3% hydrogen peroxide
1/4 cup baking soda
1 teaspoon dish-washing detergent
The solution is effervescent--it produces gas (oxygen)--and cannot be stored in a closed container, because the pressure of the gas can cause the container to explode.

January 14, 2005

Modern Pooch

Dogs

Andrea and Sparky blog about dogs all day!

via Dogster.

Check out Strummer's page on Dogster

January 9, 2005

Muttluks!

AlltheYoungPunks.JPGWinter presents its own seasonal dangers to dogs: In the snow, ice can form between a dog's pads, and, if surfaces have been treated, salt and chemicals can cause a dog's pads to crack and bleed. Also, salt and chemicals can be ingested when a dog licks his paws.

Some dogs seem not to be bothered by ice and salt. Some dogs seem not to be bothered by salt and chemicals: they'll trot along with you through the slush for miles, only for you to find cracked and bloody paws when you get home.

Remember the first snowfall of the season on November 13? The som|dog Conway Park Clean-up had to be postponed.

Strummer and I took the Canine Good Citizen Test that morning (see Citizen Strummer). Strummer had been out playing in the snow, and when we got to Canine University for the test, she still had little balls of ice in the fur around her ankles, and she would not sit because she was uncomfortable. Fortunately, by the time we took the test, the ice had melted and the floor had warmed up a little.

Strummer's Muttluks arrived in the mail later that week. Strummer hides in her crate when she sees me coming with her boots. Then, when I put them on, she acts like none of her paws work and tries to hold all four off the ground at the same time. As you can see from this picture, though, she's stoic. (You can also see that she needs to be brushed!) She can't use her nails for extra purchase when she's wearing the boots, but, despite the handicap, she seems to do okay playing chase and play-wrestling with other dogs.

Via Boston Pooch*. See "Dog Boot Recommendations" and "Pooch paw protection," which discusses the boot alternative, Musher's Secret.

*UPDATE 22 February 2006: The BostonPooch site is, alas, defunct.

Paris and Copenhagen

Jaimemonquartier.JPGParis is notorious for many reasons, not least of which is the importance of watching where you walk. The problem, of course, is that, when you are in Paris, the last thing that you are likely to be watching is where you are walking.

Dogs are ubiquitous in the city of light. The first thing I saw when I left the baggage-claim area with Strummer's other human companion and entered the Charles de Gaulle-Roissy concourse was a woman with a golden retriever. At a brasserie serving steak frites in the VIe, the people at the table behind us had a toy breed under the table.

At another restaurant, the English-speaking people at the table next to us ordered the prix fixe dinner and then requested their dessert "to go." There was great confusion and the waiter ultimately explained that they could not let the customers take the food with them because the restaurant did not have an export licence. I think that, more than a "language barrier," the misunderstanding was cultural: when you can bring your dog with you to the restaurant, you can't very well ask for a "doggie bag."

Dogs may be welcome in the airport and in restaurants in Paris; but every park I visited during my brief stay in Paris in December (four museums in three days!) was posted "No Dogs Allowed" (in French). Dogs are not allowed in parks, except in Buttes-Chaumont (XIXe), in parts of the Luxembourg Garden (VIe) and the Tuileries (Ier), where they must be on leash, and in the Bois de Boulogne and the Bois de Vincennes.

The parks in Copenhagen, on the other hand, impressed me as very dog-friendly. When I entered Orsteds Park, a man with a dog was helping himself to a "mutt mitt" from a dispenser at the park entrance. I watched as he and his dog met another human-canine couple: while the dogs play-bowed and wagged their tails in anticipation, the humans had a brief conversation (in Danish) and then let their dogs off-leash to chase each other merrily.

Paris, Tuilleries Gardens

Tuilleries.JPG

Copenhagen, Orsteds Park

Orsteds Park.JPG

Holdanlaeggetrent.JPG

January 6, 2005

Congratulations Boston!

Yesterday Mayor Menino signed the Dog Recreation Space Ordinance in the City of Boston. On the Boston Dogs message board, Stephen Fox writes:

I'm delighted to let my fellow Southenders (as well as many interested folks citywide) know that the Mayor has today signed the Dog Recreation Space Ordinance.

By signing this legislation, the Mayor has lent his considerable support to moving Boston forward on an issue that has been festering and controversial for some time. By endorsing this ordinance, the Mayor has encouraged dog owners and non-owners citywide to begin to work together to craft reasonable and sensible neighborhood specific solutions to Boston's growing urban dog recreation needs.

While enactment of the ordinance is really just a first step in the
process, it is essential to creating, for the first time in Boston's
history, a framework for sanctioned, legally recognized dog recreation spaces. We are grateful to the Boston City Council, who passed the ordinance without objection, Councillor Mike Ross, the original ordinance author, and Mayor Tom Menino, together with many supportive staff from his administration (including the Parks Department, Animal Control, and the Mayor's Office itself).

This is a real step forward, and we should all be encouraged. Special
thanks are due to the scores upon scores of dog owners and non dog owners who worked tirelessly to help to bring this legislation to fruition. The support of so many thoughtful and energetic people who lent their ideas and voices to the entire process was key to its ultimate success. Together with the Council and the Mayor, give yourselves a well deserved pat on the back.

More information about Boston's Dog Recreation Space Ordinace, can be found under "Legislation."

January 5, 2005

Off-Leash Recreation in the News

via Boston Dogs

The Christian Science Monitor ran an article on off-leash recreational areas on December 29, 2004, covering the conflicts that have arisen over off-leash recreation--such as the dog park in Fort Ethan Allen Park in Arlington, VA and Ohlone Dog Park in Berkeley, CA--and how dog owners, other park users and city administrators worked together to resolve them. The article also offers the success story of Fort Woof, a five-acre dog park in Fort Worth, TX, which "opened in April [2004], and has become one of the city's most-used parks."