Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 4.01

« A lesson learned | Main | Incident at Sheepfold »

A dog is not an accessory

Boston.com today is running three photo galleries in the Fashion section under "Your Life" featuring dog fashion. "Pooches primp and hit the runway" starts out benignly enough: the first two slides feature Juneau, an American-Eskimo dog, at Fidough on Charles Street, and Oberon, a Wire-Fox Terrier, and Redwing Indian Wolf, a Collie, from Medford. But the remaining pictures are images from Target's "Doggie Show:" deformed dogs with deformed women (and men) on the other end of the leash.

"Dog Fashion Show" includes a couple of gifts for the dog who has everything, a $500 winter coat made from bobcat fur and a $2,500 necklace by Spanish designer Antonio Menendez. While the necklace is at least something the dog's owner could borrow, a bobcat-fur dog coat does nothing to strengthen the bond between an owner and her dog. For $500, on the other hand, she could buy eighteen weeks of positive training classes at Canine University in Malden.

"Pups as accessories" is basically a photo essay on animal cruelty.

Just as expensive as a Tiffany necklace, teacup and toy dogs have become the new fashion must have.

An expensive Tiffany necklace, however, is still the better-buy: It doesn't have razor sharp teeth, it doesn't have to be house-trained, it doesn't have to be taken out first thing in the morning in the dark, rain, cold..., and it doesn't mind if you only take it out once a year.

Toy and Teacup dogs are, in the apt words or Mark Derr, "mutants maintained to feed human vanity." In Dogs Best Friend: Annals of the Dog-Human Relationship (1997), Derr observes

Like the Pekingese, some are acondroplastic drawfs with bowed and stunted legs, a punched-in face (brachycephalic head) and exaggerated coat. Others, like the Pomeranian, are midgets or ateliotic dwarfs, well-proportioned miniaturized dogs. . . . Nearly all of theses aminals—pugs, Boston terriers, Yorkies, Scotties, toy poodles, miniatureized spaniels, Maltese, Shih tzus, among them—are at the limit of their biological viability, unable to whelp naturally or exist without human intervention. Some are so distorted in temperament and appearance that it is hard to consider them dogs at all . . . . Many are unable to digest their food or relieve themselves properly. For all their problems they remain popular among people who want canine companions but consider real dogs too much bother.

To be fair, since I have become a dog-owner, I have developed an appreciation for small dogs. I was won over by Cassie, a Maltese who is known in the environs of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences to cavort with dogs many times her size and weight. Yesterday she was fetching a stick that was four times her length!

Derr is an avowed big-dog person, but his irritation is less with small dogs themselves than with breeding practices that produce physiologically unsound animals. Derr is, in fact, quite the fan of "feists" and some hunting terriers that "uphold the honor of small dogs."

Comments

Here's the letter I sent to boston.com...

Dear Fashion editor,

The photo gallery, "Dogs as accessories" on boston.com is repulsive. One caption reads, "Just as expensive as a Tiffany necklace, teacup and toy dogs have become the new fashion must have." What the gallery neglects is that unlike a dog, an expensive Tiffany necklace does not have razor sharp teeth. A necklace doesn't have to be house-trained, it doesn't have to be taken out first thing in the morning in the dark/rain/cold..., and it doesn't mind if you only take it out once a year.

Dogs are not "accessories," and to treat them as such is cruelty. A dog is a living animal; treating one as a accessory is exactly the way to wind up with a maladjusted animal that bites and otherwise behaves in ways that are socially unacceptable. By soliciting from readers photos of people who have a dog as an accessory, boston.com is encouraging careless and irresponsible dog ownership.

A person for whom a dog serves the same purpose as a necklace is not a role model of responsible dog ownership. Rather than showing celebrities who have dogs when it is good for their careers, boston.com would have done better to show people who are cultivating strong relationships with their dogs, for example through the sports of obedience and agility. The New England Dog Training Club has a gallery of just these kinds of pictures on their website. My favorites are this one of a woman executing a lovely "heel" with what appears to be a border collie and this one showing several people working with what appears to be a Maltese on the agility obstacle referred to as the "tunnel." People who enjoy active relationships with their dogs in sports such as obedience and agility are, at the same, time training their dogs to behave well in society both with people and with other dogs.

Fashions come and go, but a healthy and well-trained dog never goes out of style.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)